Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Codecov work #2891

Merged

Conversation

VanshikaSabharwal
Copy link

@VanshikaSabharwal VanshikaSabharwal commented Jan 24, 2025

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

bugfix

Issue Number:

Fixes #2854
Previous Merge Related to this issue #2877, #2888

Snapshots/Videos:
image
image

If relevant, did you update the documentation?

Summary
I have updated the push-deploy-website.yml file to send Codecov data to the Codecov website after a merge.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

Checklist

CodeRabbit AI Review

  • I have reviewed and addressed all critical issues flagged by CodeRabbit AI
  • I have implemented or provided justification for each non-critical suggestion
  • I have documented my reasoning in the PR comments where CodeRabbit AI suggestions were not implemented

Test Coverage

  • I have written tests for all new changes/features
  • I have verified that test coverage meets or exceeds 95%
  • I have run the test suite locally and all tests pass

Other information

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Added a new step to set up Node.js in the GitHub Actions workflow for automated testing on the develop-postgres branch.
    • Updated the version of pnpm for better compatibility.
    • Continuous integration remains in place to run tests and upload coverage metrics.

VanshikaSabharwal and others added 30 commits January 19, 2025 23:50
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 24, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the .github/workflows/push.yml file by introducing a new step to set up Node.js in the GitHub Actions workflow for the develop-postgres branch. This new step utilizes the actions/setup-node@v3 action with Node.js version "18". Additionally, the existing step for setting up pnpm is updated to specify version "8.6.12". The overall structure of the workflow remains intact, with the new Node.js setup integrated prior to the pnpm setup.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/push.yml Added a new "Setup Node.js" step using actions/setup-node@v3 with version "18" and updated "Setup pnpm" step version from "8" to "8.6.12"

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Restore CodeCov GitHub Action to develop-postgres branch [#2854] The PR does not address the restoration of CodeCov statistics for the develop-postgres branch.

Possibly related PRs

  • Added codecov code for showing statistics #2877: This PR introduces a new GitHub Actions workflow for the develop-postgres branch, which includes steps for running tests and uploading coverage to Codecov, closely related to the changes made in the main PR regarding the setup of Node.js and pnpm.
  • Codecov work #2888: This PR adds a step to set up pnpm in the GitHub Actions workflow for the develop-postgres branch, which is relevant to the modifications in the main PR that also involve changes to the pnpm setup.

Suggested labels

ignore-sensitive-files-pr

Suggested reviewers

  • palisadoes

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
.github/workflows/push.yml (1)

Line range hint 34-37: Add fail_ci_if_error flag to Codecov upload.

To ensure coverage upload issues don't go unnoticed, consider adding the fail_ci_if_error flag to the Codecov upload step.

       with:
         token: ${{ secrets.CODECOV_TOKEN }}
         verbose: true
         files: ./coverage/lcov.info
+        fail_ci_if_error: true
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

15-15: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ed57c24 and 4346dca.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/push.yml (1 hunks)

.github/workflows/push.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/push.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Jan 24, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 24, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Please upload report for BASE (develop-postgres@ed57c24). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##             develop-postgres    #2891   +/-   ##
===================================================
  Coverage                    ?   39.85%           
===================================================
  Files                       ?      453           
  Lines                       ?    33203           
  Branches                    ?      385           
===================================================
  Hits                        ?    13234           
  Misses                      ?    19969           
  Partials                    ?        0           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4346dca and 5959f79.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/push.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/push.yml

19-19: the runner of "actions/setup-node@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Run tests for talawa api
  • GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/push.yml (2)

27-27: LGTM! pnpm version has been updated as requested.

Thank you for implementing the specific version as suggested.


Line range hint 39-44: LGTM! Codecov integration is properly configured.

The Codecov upload step is well-configured with:

  • Secure token handling
  • Verbose logging for better debugging
  • Correct coverage file path
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

15-15: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


19-19: the runner of "actions/setup-node@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

.github/workflows/push.yml Show resolved Hide resolved
@palisadoes palisadoes merged commit 3af2495 into PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres Jan 24, 2025
17 of 18 checks passed
@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

palisadoes commented Jan 24, 2025

It's still failing

Analyze the errors
And resubmit

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants